A Federal judge in Delaware this week offered one of the first U.S. Court judgments in the debate around artificial intelligence and intellectual property.

Judge Stephanos Bibas issued an opinion in Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GMBH v. Ross Intelligence Inc., civ.

The first 24 hours of punditry on Judge Stephanos Bibas’s summary judgment of no fair use in Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence, Inc., ...

Condé Nast, which owns Ars Technica and other publications such as Wired and The New Yorker, was joined in the lawsuit by The ...

The artificial intelligence revolution brought big advances to the tech industry. However, it also brought serious challenges ...

AdExchanger is where marketers, agencies, publishers and tech companies go for the latest information on the trends that are ...

Following several rightsholder setbacks in copyright actions against AI developers, Thomson Reuters has scored a major “fair ...

Thomson Reuters just won the first major US decision in an ongoing legal battle between copyright holders and generative AI ...

Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas issued a ruling updating a previous summary judgment decision dismissing copyright infringement ...

Ross Intelligence infringed copyright by training its legal research platform on material owned by Thomson Reuters' Westlaw, a federal judge ruled this week.

Legal experts said there are key differences in Thomson Reuters' case against Ross Intelligence and other major AI-related ...

Judge Stephanos Bibas of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision Tuesday that affirmed Ross Intelligence was ...